Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs LCBVX
FFMMX vs LCBVX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs LCBVX
FFMMX vs LCBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. LCBVX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and LCBVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LCBVX (2.44B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than LCBVX: FFMMX (1.63) vs LCBVX (0.47). FFMMX was incepted earlier than LCBVX: FFMMX (6 years) vs LCBVX (13 years). LCBVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). FFMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LCBVX (18.00). LCBVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: LCBVX (0) vs FFMMX (250). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.78 vs. LCBVX (7.33). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. LCBVX (15.25).
| FFMMX | LCBVX | FFMMX / LCBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.21 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.21 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.705 | 14.893 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.44B | 4,836% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.47 | 347% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.78 | 7.33 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.67 | 16.13 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.79 | 15.25 | 248% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement