Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs RDCCX
FFMMX vs RDCCX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs RDCCX
FFMMX vs RDCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. RDCCX (198M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than RDCCX: FFMMX (1.67) vs RDCCX (0.51). FFMMX was incepted earlier than RDCCX: FFMMX (6 years) vs RDCCX (18 years). RDCCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). RDCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDCCX: FFMMX (250) vs RDCCX (2000). RDCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.86 vs. FFMMX (10.79). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. RDCCX (-10.16).
| FFMMX | RDCCX | FFMMX / RDCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.78 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.94 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.096 | 15.025 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 198M | 58,081% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.51 | 327% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 16.86 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.07 | 28.20 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.79 | -10.16 | -372% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers