Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs RDCCX
FFMMX vs RDCCX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs RDCCX
FFMMX vs RDCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. RDCCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and RDCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. RDCCX (221M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than RDCCX: FFMMX (1.63) vs RDCCX (0.47). FFMMX was incepted earlier than RDCCX: FFMMX (6 years) vs RDCCX (18 years). RDCCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). RDCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDCCX: FFMMX (250) vs RDCCX (2000). RDCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.18 vs. FFMMX (5.42). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.64 vs. RDCCX (-4.40).
| FFMMX | RDCCX | FFMMX / RDCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.78 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.94 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.977 | 23.522 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 221M | 52,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.47 | 344% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 15.18 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 30.65 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | -4.40 | -901% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement