Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs RDCCX
FFMMX vs RDCCX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs RDCCX
FFMMX vs RDCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RDCCX (208M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than RDCCX: FFMMX (1.65) vs RDCCX (0.51). FFMMX was incepted earlier than RDCCX: FFMMX (6 years) vs RDCCX (18 years). RDCCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). RDCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDCCX: FFMMX (250) vs RDCCX (2000). RDCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.52 vs. FFMMX (9.53). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.28 vs. RDCCX (-5.19).
| FFMMX | RDCCX | FFMMX / RDCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.78 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.94 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.451 | 19.704 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 208M | 56,731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.51 | 324% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | 17.52 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.24 | 27.09 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.28 | -5.19 | -795% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLQM | 59.10 | 0.10 | +0.17% |
| Franklin US Mid Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF | |||
| BILZ | 100.76 | N/A | N/A |
| PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active ETF | |||
| BNJ | 15.57 | -0.03 | -0.18% |
| Brookfield Finance I (UK) plc | |||
| PRCS | 28.53 | -0.15 | -0.52% |
| Parnassus Core Select ETF | |||
| MSTQ | 38.51 | -0.76 | -1.93% |
| LHA Market State™ Tactical Q ETF | |||