Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs RMFAX
FFMMX vs RMFAX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs RMFAX
FFMMX vs RMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. RMFAX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Hold and RMFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX (117B) and RMFAX (117B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FFMMX pays higher dividends than RMFAX: FFMMX (1.63) vs RMFAX (0.75). FFMMX was incepted earlier than RMFAX: FFMMX (6 years) vs RMFAX (24 years). RMFAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). FFMMX (30.00) and RMFAX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFMMX (250) and RMFAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.33 vs. RMFAX (3.19). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.61 vs. RMFAX (31.57).
| FFMMX | RMFAX | FFMMX / RMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.36 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.36 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.849 | 7.087 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 117B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.75 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.33 | 3.19 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.32 | 32.11 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.61 | 31.57 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers