Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs RSDFX
FFMMX vs RSDFX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs RSDFX
FFMMX vs RSDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. RSDFX (2.44B). RSDFX pays higher dividends than FFMMX: RSDFX (2.52) vs FFMMX (1.67). FFMMX was incepted earlier than RSDFX: FFMMX (6 years) vs RSDFX (18 years). RSDFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). RSDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). RSDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: RSDFX (0) vs FFMMX (250). RSDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.01 vs. FFMMX (10.79). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. RSDFX (29.68).
| FFMMX | RSDFX | FFMMX / RSDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.74 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.74 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.096 | 11.913 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 2.44B | 4,713% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 2.52 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 20.01 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.07 | 45.47 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.79 | 29.68 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers