Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs RSDFX
FFMMX vs RSDFX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs RSDFX
FFMMX vs RSDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RSDFX (2.56B). RSDFX pays higher dividends than FFMMX: RSDFX (2.36) vs FFMMX (1.64). FFMMX was incepted earlier than RSDFX: FFMMX (6 years) vs RSDFX (18 years). RSDFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). RSDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). RSDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: RSDFX (0) vs FFMMX (250). RSDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.95 vs. FFMMX (9.76). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.13 vs. RSDFX (35.96).
| FFMMX | RSDFX | FFMMX / RSDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.74 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.74 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.858 | 16.517 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.56B | 4,609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 2.36 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.76 | 20.95 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.53 | 42.53 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.13 | 35.96 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement