Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs TQMVX
FFMMX vs TQMVX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs TQMVX
FFMMX vs TQMVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TQMVX (81.6M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than TQMVX: FFMMX (1.67) vs TQMVX (1.37). FFMMX was incepted earlier than TQMVX: FFMMX (6 years) vs TQMVX (10 years). TQMVX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). TQMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.60 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQMVX: FFMMX (250) vs TQMVX (2500). TQMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.89 vs. FFMMX (9.97). TQMVX (39.67) and FFMMX (38.69) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFMMX | TQMVX | FFMMX / TQMVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.72 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.35 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.210 | 13.951 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 81.6M | 143,382% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.37 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.97 | 22.89 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.90 | 42.45 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.69 | 39.67 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 128.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CDVZX | 20.58 | 0.20 | +0.98% |
| Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional | |||
| DMCVX | 32.89 | 0.30 | +0.92% |
| BNY Mellon Midcap Value Fund A | |||
| SNPTX | 23.67 | 0.10 | +0.42% |
| DWS Equity Sector Strategy Institutional | |||
| WAAEX | 37.05 | 0.15 | +0.41% |
| Wasatch Small Cap Growth Investor | |||
| JRASX | 87.99 | N/A | N/A |
| Janus Henderson Research S | |||