Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs TRCPX
FFMMX vs TRCPX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs TRCPX
FFMMX vs TRCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TRCPX (6.46B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than TRCPX: FFMMX (1.65) vs TRCPX (1.27). FFMMX was incepted earlier than TRCPX: FFMMX (6 years) vs TRCPX (17 years). TRCPX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). FFMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRCPX (17.00). TRCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: TRCPX (0) vs FFMMX (250). TRCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.55 vs. FFMMX (9.53). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.28 vs. TRCPX (31.87).
| FFMMX | TRCPX | FFMMX / TRCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.55 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.55 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.451 | 15.491 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 6.46B | 1,828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.27 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | 16.55 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.24 | 41.48 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.28 | 31.87 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement