Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs TRCPX
FFMMX vs TRCPX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs TRCPX
FFMMX vs TRCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. TRCPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and TRCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TRCPX (6.38B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than TRCPX: FFMMX (1.63) vs TRCPX (1.21). FFMMX was incepted earlier than TRCPX: FFMMX (6 years) vs TRCPX (17 years). TRCPX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). FFMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRCPX (17.00). TRCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: TRCPX (0) vs FFMMX (250). TRCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.79 vs. FFMMX (5.42). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.64 vs. TRCPX (33.01).
| FFMMX | TRCPX | FFMMX / TRCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.55 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.55 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.977 | 17.548 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 6.38B | 1,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.21 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 14.79 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 43.37 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | 33.01 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement