Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs TRLCX
FFMMX vs TRLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs TRLCX
FFMMX vs TRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TRLCX (6.46B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than TRLCX: FFMMX (1.65) vs TRLCX (1.17). FFMMX was incepted earlier than TRLCX: FFMMX (6 years) vs TRLCX (24 years). TRLCX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). FFMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRLCX (17.00). TRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: TRLCX (0) vs FFMMX (250). TRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.44 vs. FFMMX (9.53). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.28 vs. TRLCX (31.28).
| FFMMX | TRLCX | FFMMX / TRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.65 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.65 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.451 | 15.466 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 6.46B | 1,828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.17 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | 16.44 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.24 | 41.02 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.28 | 31.28 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement