Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs TRLHX
FFMMX vs TRLHX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs TRLHX
FFMMX vs TRLHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. TRLHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and TRLHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TRLHX (6.38B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than TRLHX: FFMMX (1.63) vs TRLHX (1.35). FFMMX was incepted earlier than TRLHX: FFMMX (6 years) vs TRLHX (11 years). TRLHX (0.43) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). FFMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRLHX (17.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRLHX: FFMMX (250) vs TRLHX (100000). TRLHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.90 vs. FFMMX (5.42). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.64 vs. TRLHX (33.53).
| FFMMX | TRLHX | FFMMX / TRLHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.43 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.43 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.977 | 17.674 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 6.38B | 1,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.35 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 14.90 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 43.80 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | 33.53 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement