Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs WHGLX
FFMMX vs WHGLX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs WHGLX
FFMMX vs WHGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. WHGLX (73.8M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than WHGLX: FFMMX (1.67) vs WHGLX (1.05). FFMMX was incepted earlier than WHGLX: FFMMX (6 years) vs WHGLX (20 years). WHGLX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). WHGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGLX: FFMMX (250) vs WHGLX (100000). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.97 vs. WHGLX (-8.85). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.69 vs. WHGLX (-10.42).
| FFMMX | WHGLX | FFMMX / WHGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.63 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.71 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.210 | 4.868 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 73.8M | 158,537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.05 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.97 | -8.85 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.90 | 1.65 | 2,236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.69 | -10.42 | -371% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CDVZX | 20.58 | 0.20 | +0.98% |
| Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional | |||
| DMCVX | 32.89 | 0.30 | +0.92% |
| BNY Mellon Midcap Value Fund A | |||
| SNPTX | 23.67 | 0.10 | +0.42% |
| DWS Equity Sector Strategy Institutional | |||
| WAAEX | 37.05 | 0.15 | +0.41% |
| Wasatch Small Cap Growth Investor | |||
| JRASX | 87.99 | N/A | N/A |
| Janus Henderson Research S | |||