Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs WHGQX
FFMMX vs WHGQX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs WHGQX
FFMMX vs WHGQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. WHGQX (76.6M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than WHGQX: FFMMX (1.64) vs WHGQX (1.10). FFMMX was incepted earlier than WHGQX: FFMMX (6 years) vs WHGQX (4 years). WHGQX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). WHGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGQX: FFMMX (250) vs WHGQX (1000000). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.76 vs. WHGQX (-7.18).
| FFMMX | WHGQX | FFMMX / WHGQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.55 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.63 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.858 | 9.442 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 76.6M | 154,047% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 1.10 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.76 | -7.18 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.53 | 0.56 | 6,399% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.13 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement