Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFNAX vs HBLAX
FFNAX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFNAX vs HBLAX
FFNAX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNAX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNAX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FFNAX (2.86B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FFNAX: HBLAX (3.13) vs FFNAX (2.09). FFNAX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FFNAX (19 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FFNAX (0.80). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFNAX (27.00). FFNAX (6%) and HBLAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FFNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FFNAX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNAX: HBLAX (2000) vs FFNAX (500). FFNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. HBLAX (1.22). FFNAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.04 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| FFNAX | HBLAX | FFNAX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.89 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.89 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.767 | 4.076 | 166% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.86B | 10.9B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 3.13 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.95 | 1.22 | 652% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.18 | 19.75 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.04 | 4.63 | 390% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.08 | 39.00 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement