Ad is loading...
FFNAX vs HBLCX
FFNAX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFNAX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% A
Price$13.07
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.1B
FFNAX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNAX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNAX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FFNAX (2.26B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FFNAX: HBLCX (2.65) vs FFNAX (2.13). FFNAX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FFNAX (17 years) vs HBLCX (18 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FFNAX (21.00). FFNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FFNAX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNAX: HBLCX (2000) vs FFNAX (500). FFNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. HBLCX (5.09). FFNAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.64 vs. HBLCX (4.44).
| FFNAX | HBLCX | FFNAX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.927 | 1.293 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 12.1B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 2.65 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | 5.09 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.06 | -2.03 | -151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.64 | 4.44 | 397% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.55 | 24.83 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers