Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
FFNAX vs HBLCX
FFNAX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFNAX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% A
Price$13.10
Change-$0.07 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.76
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FFNAX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNAX vs. HBLCX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNAX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. FFNAX (2.25B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FFNAX: HBLCX (2.65) vs FFNAX (2.13). FFNAX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FFNAX (17 years) vs HBLCX (18 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FFNAX (21.00). FFNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FFNAX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNAX: HBLCX (2000) vs FFNAX (500). HBLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.37 vs. FFNAX (13.19). FFNAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.97 vs. HBLCX (11.08).
| FFNAX | HBLCX | FFNAX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.265 | 7.151 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 12.4B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 2.65 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.19 | 14.37 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.50 | -3.42 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.97 | 11.08 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.60 | 27.88 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers