Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFNAX vs HBLRX
FFNAX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FFNAX vs HBLRX
FFNAX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNAX vs. HBLRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNAX is a Buy and HBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FFNAX (2.86B). HBLRX pays higher dividends than FFNAX: HBLRX (2.74) vs FFNAX (2.09). FFNAX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FFNAX (19 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FFNAX (0.80). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFNAX (27.00). FFNAX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. HBLRX (0.88). FFNAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.04 vs. HBLRX (2.74).
| FFNAX | HBLRX | FFNAX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.27 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.27 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.767 | 3.850 | 176% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.86B | 10.9B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 2.74 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.95 | 0.88 | 901% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.18 | 18.49 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.04 | 2.74 | 658% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.08 | 34.74 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers