Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFNCX vs HBLCX
FFNCX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFNCX vs HBLCX
FFNCX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNCX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNCX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FFNCX (2.81B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FFNCX: HBLCX (2.49) vs FFNCX (1.44). FFNCX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FFNCX (19 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FFNCX (1.55). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFNCX (27.00). FFNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FFNCX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNCX: HBLCX (2000) vs FFNCX (500). FFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.46 vs. HBLCX (4.98). FFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.94 vs. HBLCX (2.39).
| FFNCX | HBLCX | FFNCX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.65 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.65 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.128 | 3.319 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.81B | 11.1B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 2.49 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.46 | 4.98 | 290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.06 | 17.42 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.94 | 2.39 | 707% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.50 | 32.68 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement