Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFNCX vs HBLRX
FFNCX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FFNCX vs HBLRX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% C
Price$14.06
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$15.21
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.98B
FFNCX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNCX vs. HBLRX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNCX is a StrongBuy and HBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. FFNCX (2.36B). HBLRX pays higher dividends than FFNCX: HBLRX (2.88) vs FFNCX (1.59). FFNCX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FFNCX (18 years) vs HBLRX (15 years). FFNCX (1.53) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.28). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFNCX (13.00). FFNCX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. HBLRX (2.83). FFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.69 vs. HBLRX (14.42).
| FFNCX | HBLRX | FFNCX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.28 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.28 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.392 | 8.435 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 12B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 2.88 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.24 | 2.83 | 291% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.87 | 18.15 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.69 | 14.42 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.86 | 43.97 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers