Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFNCX vs HBLRX
FFNCX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FFNCX vs HBLRX
FFNCX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNCX vs. HBLRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNCX is a Buy and HBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FFNCX (2.86B). HBLRX pays higher dividends than FFNCX: HBLRX (2.74) vs FFNCX (1.35). FFNCX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FFNCX (19 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). FFNCX (1.55) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.27). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFNCX (27.00). FFNCX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.22 vs. HBLRX (0.88). FFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 13.72 vs. HBLRX (2.74).
| FFNCX | HBLRX | FFNCX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.27 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.27 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.241 | 3.850 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.86B | 10.9B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 2.74 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.22 | 0.88 | 819% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.20 | 18.49 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.72 | 2.74 | 501% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.20 | 34.74 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers