Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFNCX vs HBLRX
FFNCX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FFNCX vs HBLRX
FFNCX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNCX vs. HBLRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNCX is a Buy and HBLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FFNCX (2.81B). HBLRX pays higher dividends than FFNCX: HBLRX (2.76) vs FFNCX (1.37). FFNCX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FFNCX (19 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). FFNCX (1.55) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.27). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFNCX (27.00). FFNCX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.69 vs. HBLRX (4.55). FFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.71 vs. HBLRX (4.28).
| FFNCX | HBLRX | FFNCX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.27 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.27 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.101 | 5.721 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.81B | 11.1B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 2.76 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.69 | 4.55 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.73 | 21.77 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.71 | 4.28 | 367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.20 | 34.84 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers