Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFNCX vs HBLYX
FFNCX vs HBLYX Comparison
Open Charts FFNCX vs HBLYX
FFNCX vs HBLYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNCX vs. HBLYX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNCX is a Buy and HBLYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLYX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FFNCX (2.86B). HBLYX pays higher dividends than FFNCX: HBLYX (3.27) vs FFNCX (1.35). FFNCX was incepted earlier than HBLYX: FFNCX (19 years) vs HBLYX (20 years). FFNCX (1.55) is less costly to investors than HBLYX (0.67). HBLYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFNCX (27.00). FFNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLYX: FFNCX (0) vs HBLYX (250000). FFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.22 vs. HBLYX (1.47). FFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 13.72 vs. HBLYX (5.98).
| FFNCX | HBLYX | FFNCX / HBLYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.67 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.67 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.241 | 4.252 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.86B | 10.9B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 3.27 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.22 | 1.47 | 491% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.20 | 20.75 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.72 | 5.98 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.20 | 42.45 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement