Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFNIX vs HBLCX
FFNIX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFNIX vs HBLCX
FFNIX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNIX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNIX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FFNIX (2.83B). HBLCX (2.47) and FFNIX (2.38) have matching dividends . FFNIX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FFNIX (19 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FFNIX (0.55). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFNIX (27.00). FFNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FFNIX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNIX: HBLCX (2000) vs FFNIX (500). FFNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.93 vs. HBLCX (4.05). FFNIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.52 vs. HBLCX (1.87).
| FFNIX | HBLCX | FFNIX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.65 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.65 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.273 | 3.951 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.83B | 11.1B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 2.47 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.93 | 4.05 | 319% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.43 | 15.85 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.52 | 1.87 | 1,152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.22 | 28.44 | 233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement