Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFNTX vs HBLCX
FFNTX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFNTX vs HBLCX
FFNTX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNTX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNTX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FFNTX (2.81B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FFNTX: HBLCX (2.49) vs FFNTX (1.96). FFNTX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FFNTX (19 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FFNTX (1.05). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFNTX (27.00). FFNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FFNTX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNTX: HBLCX (2000) vs FFNTX (500). FFNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.04 vs. HBLCX (4.98). FFNTX return over 5 years is better than : 19.97 vs. HBLCX (2.39).
| FFNTX | HBLCX | FFNTX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.65 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.65 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.335 | 3.319 | 221% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.81B | 11.1B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 2.49 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.04 | 4.98 | 302% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.03 | 17.42 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.97 | 2.39 | 834% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.66 | 32.68 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement