Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFNTX vs HBLSX
FFNTX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FFNTX vs HBLSX
FFNTX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNTX vs. HBLSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNTX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FFNTX (2.86B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FFNTX: HBLSX (3.02) vs FFNTX (1.89). FFNTX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FFNTX (19 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). FFNTX (1.05) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFNTX (27.00). FFNTX (0) and HBLSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. HBLSX (1.12). FFNTX return over 5 years is better than : 16.60 vs. HBLSX (4.26).
| FFNTX | HBLSX | FFNTX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.96 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.96 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.528 | 3.987 | 164% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.86B | 10.9B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 3.02 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | 1.12 | 693% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.20 | 19.56 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.60 | 4.26 | 389% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.08 | 38.33 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers