It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FFNW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGYR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FFNW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGYR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FFNW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.33% price change this week, while MGYR (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.
FFNW is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.
MGYR is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
FFNW | MGYR | FFNW / MGYR | |
Capitalization | 190M | 73.9M | 257% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -2.903 | -0.959 | 303% |
P/E Ratio | 30.00 | 61.67 | 49% |
Revenue | 43.3M | 30.7M | 141% |
Total Cash | 8.07M | 3.13M | 258% |
Total Debt | 128M | 28.8M | 444% |
FFNW | MGYR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MGYR's Valuation (39) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFNW (97). This means that MGYR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFNW’s over the last 12 months.
FFNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MGYR (52). This means that FFNW’s stock grew similarly to MGYR’s over the last 12 months.
MGYR's SMR Rating (60) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FFNW (77). This means that MGYR’s stock grew similarly to FFNW’s over the last 12 months.
MGYR's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FFNW (58). This means that MGYR’s stock grew similarly to FFNW’s over the last 12 months.
FFNW's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGYR (100). This means that FFNW’s stock grew significantly faster than MGYR’s over the last 12 months.
FFNW | MGYR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago60% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago56% | 12 days ago44% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago33% | 12 days ago47% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago39% | 12 days ago40% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago42% | 12 days ago46% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago58% | about 1 month ago55% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago37% | 13 days ago33% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago37% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago45% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFNW has been loosely correlated with TSBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFNW jumps, then TSBK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFNW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FFNW | 100% | +0.77% | ||
TSBK - FFNW | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
TRST - FFNW | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
EFSC - FFNW | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
THFF - FFNW | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
CCNE - FFNW | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGYR has been loosely correlated with LSBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGYR jumps, then LSBK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGYR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MGYR | 100% | -1.23% | ||
LSBK - MGYR | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
FFNW - MGYR | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
BOH - MGYR | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
EBC - MGYR | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
TFC - MGYR | 30% Poorly correlated | +5.94% | ||
More |