Advertisement
BOH vs MGYR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOH is a Buy and MGYR is a Hold.
BOH | MGYR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 92 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BOH's Valuation (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MGYR (42) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BOH’s stock grew similarly to MGYR’s over the last 12 months.
MGYR's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BOH (96) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MGYR’s stock grew significantly faster than BOH’s over the last 12 months.
BOH's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGYR (59) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BOH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGYR’s over the last 12 months.
MGYR's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BOH (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MGYR’s stock grew similarly to BOH’s over the last 12 months.
MGYR's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BOH (69) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MGYR’s stock grew similarly to BOH’s over the last 12 months.
| BOH | MGYR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 58% | 16 days ago 46% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 28% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 30% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 44% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BOH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MGYR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BOH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MGYR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BOH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGYR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BOH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MGYR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BOH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.39% price change this week, while MGYR (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
BOH is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CATF | 47.58 | 0.34 | +0.72% |
| American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) | |||
| ETV | 14.95 | 0.03 | +0.20% |
| Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | |||
| NURE | 29.52 | 0.04 | +0.14% |
| Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) | |||
| CPHY | 50.51 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
| F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF (CPHY) | |||
| FEMB | 28.29 | -0.19 | -0.67% |
| First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) | |||
BOH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOH has been closely correlated with FHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BOH jumps, then FHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOH | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| FHB - BOH | 84% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| FULT - BOH | 83% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| TRMK - BOH | 80% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| UBSI - BOH | 80% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| FNB - BOH | 80% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||
MGYR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGYR has been loosely correlated with LSBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGYR jumps, then LSBK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGYR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGYR | 100% | N/A | ||
| LSBK - MGYR | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| WAFDP - MGYR | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
| BOH - MGYR | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| EBC - MGYR | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
| CNOBP - MGYR | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||