Advertisement
FFPP vs KGDEY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFPP is a Hold and KGDEY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FFPP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKGDEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FFPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KGDEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
FFPP (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KGDEY (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
KGDEY is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+3.07% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FFPP | KGDEY | FFPP / KGDEY | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 6.05B | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | -455.88M | - |
| Gain YTD | 125.000 | 73.816 | 169% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 4.5B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.98B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 124M | - |
FFPP | KGDEY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FFPP's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KGDEY (100). This means that FFPP’s stock grew significantly faster than KGDEY’s over the last 12 months.
KGDEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as FFPP (100). This means that KGDEY’s stock grew similarly to FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
KGDEY's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as FFPP (100). This means that KGDEY’s stock grew similarly to FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
KGDEY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FFPP (37). This means that KGDEY’s stock grew similarly to FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
KGDEY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFPP (100). This means that KGDEY’s stock grew significantly faster than FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
FFPP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FFPP and PAYS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFPP and PAYS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFPP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFPP | 100% | N/A | ||
| PAYS - FFPP | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.95% | ||
| CCOEF - FFPP | 20% Poorly correlated | +17.56% | ||
| KGDEY - FFPP | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ZCMD - FFPP | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.79% | ||
| SBIG - FFPP | 9% Poorly correlated | -9.09% | ||
More | ||||
KGDEY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KGDEY and KC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGDEY and KC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KGDEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGDEY | 100% | N/A | ||
| KC - KGDEY | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.93% | ||
| ADYYF - KGDEY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| YHEKF - KGDEY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OCFT - KGDEY | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| FFPP - KGDEY | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||