Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRAX vs RFRAX
FFRAX vs RFRAX Comparison
Open Charts FFRAX vs RFRAX
FFRAX vs RFRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRAX vs. RFRAX commentary
Jul 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRAX is a Hold and RFRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRAX has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. RFRAX (666M). FFRAX (6.75) and RFRAX (6.50) have matching dividends . FFRAX was incepted earlier than RFRAX: FFRAX (26 years) vs RFRAX (20 years). RFRAX (1.07) and FFRAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . RFRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. FFRAX (58.00). RFRAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFRAX (3%) vs FFRAX (3%). FFRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFRAX: FFRAX (0) vs RFRAX (2000). RFRAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFRAX: RFRAX (5000) vs FFRAX (500). FFRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.72 vs. RFRAX (4.06). FFRAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.69 vs. RFRAX (27.61).
| FFRAX | RFRAX | FFRAX / RFRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.01 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.786 | 1.360 | 131% |
| Front Load | 3% | 3% | 92% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 5000 | 10% |
| Net Assets | 14.4B | 666M | 2,162% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.75 | 6.50 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.72 | 4.06 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.72 | 22.68 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.69 | 27.61 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.35 | 56.40 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers