Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRCX vs RFRFX
FFRCX vs RFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRCX vs. RFRFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRCX is a Buy and RFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRCX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. RFRFX (747M). RFRFX pays higher dividends than FFRCX: RFRFX (7.34) vs FFRCX (6.63). FFRCX was incepted earlier than RFRFX: FFRCX (25 years) vs RFRFX (17 years). FFRCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RFRFX (0.76). RFRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRCX (41.00). FFRCX (0) and RFRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.75 vs. FFRCX (5.90). RFRFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.26 vs. FFRCX (30.88).
| FFRCX | RFRFX | FFRCX / RFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.73 | 242% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.76 | 233% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.799 | 4.626 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 747M | 2,035% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.63 | 7.34 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | 7.75 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.17 | 28.10 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.88 | 34.26 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.34 | 60.06 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers