Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRCX vs RFRFX
FFRCX vs RFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRCX vs. RFRFX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRCX is a Buy and RFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRCX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. RFRFX (752M). RFRFX pays higher dividends than FFRCX: RFRFX (7.43) vs FFRCX (6.73). FFRCX was incepted earlier than RFRFX: FFRCX (25 years) vs RFRFX (17 years). FFRCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RFRFX (0.76). RFRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRCX (41.00). FFRCX (0) and RFRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.79 vs. FFRCX (5.89). RFRFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.75 vs. FFRCX (32.50).
| FFRCX | RFRFX | FFRCX / RFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.73 | 242% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.76 | 233% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.036 | 3.891 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 752M | 2,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.73 | 7.43 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 7.79 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.44 | 26.99 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.50 | 36.75 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.69 | 57.92 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement