Ad is loading...
FFRHX vs GIFIX
FFRHX vs GIFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. GIFIX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and GIFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. GIFIX (775M). GIFIX (8.19) and FFRHX (8.13) have matching dividends . FFRHX was incepted earlier than GIFIX: FFRHX (23 years) vs GIFIX (13 years). GIFIX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FFRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GIFIX (37.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GIFIX: FFRHX (0) vs GIFIX (2000000). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.47 vs. GIFIX (5.06). FFRHX (44.55) and GIFIX (42.98) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFRHX | GIFIX | FFRHX / GIFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.80 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.89 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.828 | -0.416 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 775M | 2,065% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.13 | 8.19 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 5.06 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.03 | 20.52 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.55 | 42.98 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.04 | 51.31 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers