Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSDX vs PDODX
FFSDX vs PDODX Comparison
Open Charts FFSDX vs PDODX
FFSDX vs PDODX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFSDX vs. PDODX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFSDX is a Hold and PDODX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFSDX has more cash in the bank: 3.56B vs. PDODX (2.63M). PDODX pays higher dividends than FFSDX: PDODX (1.38) vs FFSDX (1.21). FFSDX was incepted earlier than PDODX: FFSDX (7 years) vs PDODX (7 years). PDODX (18.79) is less costly to investors than FFSDX (0.65). PDODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FFSDX (11.00). FFSDX (0) and PDODX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PDODX (20.32) and FFSDX (19.92) have marching annual gain over last year. PDODX return over 5 years is better than : 42.16 vs. FFSDX (38.28).
| FFSDX | PDODX | FFSDX / PDODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 18.79 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.524 | 14.891 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.56B | 2.63M | 135,462% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.38 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.92 | 20.32 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.10 | 57.96 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.28 | 42.16 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement