Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSZX vs RCPTX
FFSZX vs RCPTX Comparison
Open Charts FFSZX vs RCPTX
FFSZX vs RCPTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFSZX vs. RCPTX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFSZX is a Hold and RCPTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCPTX has more cash in the bank: 7.38B vs. FFSZX (3.56B). FFSZX pays higher dividends than RCPTX: FFSZX (1.34) vs RCPTX (0.27). FFSZX was incepted earlier than RCPTX: FFSZX (7 years) vs RCPTX (6 years). RCPTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FFSZX (0.45). FFSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. RCPTX (5.00). FFSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCPTX: FFSZX (0) vs RCPTX (250). FFSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.17 vs. RCPTX (13.79). FFSZX return over 5 years is better than : 39.45 vs. RCPTX (37.08).
| FFSZX | RCPTX | FFSZX / RCPTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.03 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.03 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.611 | 11.579 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.56B | 7.38B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.27 | 494% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.17 | 13.79 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.19 | 57.80 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.45 | 37.08 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement