Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBAX
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% M
Price$22.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.58
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.83B
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. FFTMX (9.97B). FFTMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFTMX (1.74) vs RLBAX (1.10). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFTMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFTMX (1.08). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFTMX (12.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFTMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.64 vs. RLBAX (7.88). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.54 vs. FFTMX (23.75).
| FFTMX | RLBAX | FFTMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.31 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.31 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.200 | 13.829 | 88% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.97B | 266B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.10 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.64 | 7.88 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.36 | 48.34 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.75 | 37.54 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.63 | 67.35 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement