Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBAX
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% M
Price$22.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.08B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.40
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. FFTMX (10.1B). FFTMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFTMX (1.73) vs RLBAX (1.08). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFTMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFTMX (1.08). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFTMX (12.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFTMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.89 vs. RLBAX (8.15). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.46 vs. FFTMX (19.81).
| FFTMX | RLBAX | FFTMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.31 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.31 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.504 | 13.298 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 263B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.08 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.89 | 8.15 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.21 | 38.05 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.81 | 34.46 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.83 | 63.50 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement