Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBAX
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBAX
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FFTMX (10.9B). FFTMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFTMX (1.68) vs RLBAX (1.14). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFTMX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FFTMX (1.10). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFTMX (25.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.80 vs. FFTMX (13.72). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.83 vs. FFTMX (16.94).
| FFTMX | RLBAX | FFTMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.32 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.854 | 8.988 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.14 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.72 | 15.80 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.32 | 41.07 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.94 | 31.83 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.08 | 80.24 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement