Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBAX
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBAX
FFTMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FFTMX (10.9B). FFTMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFTMX (1.57) vs RLBAX (1.12). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFTMX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FFTMX (1.10). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFTMX (25.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX (5.83) and FFTMX (5.75) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. FFTMX (13.51).
| FFTMX | RLBAX | FFTMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.32 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.119 | 7.935 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 285B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.12 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.75 | 5.83 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.33 | 38.21 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.51 | 27.39 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.85 | 75.00 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement