Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBEX
FFTMX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBEX
FFTMX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FFTMX (10.9B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than FFTMX: RLBEX (1.77) vs FFTMX (1.67). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FFTMX (20 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FFTMX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFTMX (25.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. FFTMX (10.75). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 33.01 vs. FFTMX (15.55).
| FFTMX | RLBEX | FFTMX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.60 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.60 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.536 | 8.550 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.77 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.75 | 12.03 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.25 | 39.63 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.55 | 33.01 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.74 | 83.90 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement