Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBEX
FFTMX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBEX
FFTMX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FFTMX (10.9B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than FFTMX: RLBEX (1.77) vs FFTMX (1.57). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FFTMX (20 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FFTMX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFTMX (25.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. FFTMX (5.75). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 31.46 vs. FFTMX (13.51).
| FFTMX | RLBEX | FFTMX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.60 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.60 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.119 | 8.496 | 96% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 285B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.77 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.75 | 6.66 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.33 | 41.40 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.51 | 31.46 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.85 | 86.42 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement