Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBFX
FFTMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBFX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% M
Price$21.77
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.63B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.27
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
FFTMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. FFTMX (9.63B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FFTMX: RLBFX (2.10) vs FFTMX (1.79). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFTMX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). FFTMX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFTMX (12.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. FFTMX (9.40). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.40 vs. FFTMX (23.82).
| FFTMX | RLBFX | FFTMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.918 | 9.189 | 86% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.63B | 254B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 2.10 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.40 | 10.60 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.53 | 35.79 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.82 | 41.40 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.94 | 68.15 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement