Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBFX
FFTMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBFX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% M
Price$22.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.76B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.73B
FFTMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 258B vs. FFTMX (9.76B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FFTMX: RLBFX (2.05) vs FFTMX (1.78). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFTMX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). FFTMX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFTMX (12.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. FFTMX (8.53). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.46 vs. FFTMX (22.64).
| FFTMX | RLBFX | FFTMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.603 | 11.562 | 83% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.76B | 258B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 2.05 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 10.28 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.21 | 40.92 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.64 | 41.46 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.35 | 78.40 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement