Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBFX
FFTMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBFX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% M
Price$21.21
Change+$0.10 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.42B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.88
Change+$0.20 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.2B
FFTMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. FFTMX (9.42B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FFTMX: RLBFX (2.18) vs FFTMX (1.85). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFTMX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). FFTMX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFTMX (12.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). FFTMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.62 vs. RLBFX (5.15). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.51 vs. FFTMX (23.19).
| FFTMX | RLBFX | FFTMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.096 | 4.531 | 90% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.42B | 244B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 2.18 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.62 | 5.15 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.86 | 30.71 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.19 | 40.51 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.38 | 61.24 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement