Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTMX vs RLBFX
FFTMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFTMX vs RLBFX
FFTMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTMX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FFTMX (10.9B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FFTMX: RLBFX (2.03) vs FFTMX (1.57). FFTMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFTMX (20 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FFTMX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFTMX (25.00). FFTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFTMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. FFTMX (5.75). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. FFTMX (13.51).
| FFTMX | RLBFX | FFTMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.30 | 357% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.30 | 367% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.119 | 8.705 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 285B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 2.03 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.75 | 6.98 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.33 | 42.70 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.51 | 33.18 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.85 | 87.98 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement