FG
Price
$40.13
Change
-$0.41 (-1.01%)
Updated
May 9, 6:59 PM EST
MET
Price
$72.56
Change
+$0.90 (+1.26%)
Updated
May 9, 6:59 PM EST
83 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FG vs MET

Header iconFG vs MET Comparison
Open Charts FG vs METBanner chart's image
F&G Annuities & Life
Price$40.13
Change-$0.41 (-1.01%)
Volume$28.64K
CapitalizationN/A
MetLife
Price$72.56
Change+$0.90 (+1.26%)
Volume$780.1K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FG vs MET Comparison Chart

Loading...

FGDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
METDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
FG vs. MET commentary
May 09, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FG is a Hold and MET is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2024
Stock price -- (FG: $40.50 vs. MET: $71.66)
Brand notoriety: FG: Not notable vs. MET: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FG: 97% vs. MET: 78%
Market capitalization -- FG: $5.11B vs. MET: $53.28B
FG [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $5.11B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $53.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $23.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FG is a better buy in the long-term than MET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FG’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FG’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FG is a better buy in the short-term than MET.

Price Growth

FG (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +5.00% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +0.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

FG is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2024.

MET is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.52% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FG with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MET with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($53.3B) has a higher market cap than FG($5.11B). FG has higher P/E ratio than MET: FG (72.99) vs MET (40.71). MET YTD gains are higher at: 10.074 vs. FG (-11.453). MET has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. FG (43.4B). FG has less debt than MET: FG (1.77B) vs MET (18.8B). MET has higher revenues than FG: MET (66.4B) vs FG (4.31B).
FGMETFG / MET
Capitalization5.11B53.3B10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.45310.074-114%
P/E Ratio72.9940.71179%
Revenue4.31B66.4B6%
Total Cash43.4B308B14%
Total Debt1.77B18.8B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MET: Fundamental Ratings
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FGDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
METDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDXD25.250.24
+0.96%
MicroSectors™ Gold Mns 3X Inv Lvrgd ETN
IYF94.060.32
+0.34%
iShares US Financials ETF
UYLD50.86-0.01
-0.02%
Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF
SIHY44.89-0.07
-0.16%
Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF
IVEG19.89-0.04
-0.21%
iShares Emergent Food and AgTch Mult ETF

FG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FG has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FG jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FG
1D Price
Change %
FG100%
+0.15%
CNO - FG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
GNW - FG
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
BHF - FG
41%
Loosely correlated
-10.38%
PRI - FG
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
LNC - FG
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
More

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with AFL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then AFL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
+0.56%
AFL - MET
86%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
PRU - MET
83%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
CNO - MET
71%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
LNC - MET
69%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
BHF - MET
66%
Loosely correlated
-10.38%
More