AFL
Price
$111.55
Change
+$0.37 (+0.33%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
56.93B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MET
Price
$94.42
Change
+$0.07 (+0.07%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
60.89B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFL vs MET

AFL vs MET Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFL vs. MET commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a Hold and MET is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6885
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
626
SMR RATING
1..100
9499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9117
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MET's Valuation (40) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (63). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (26). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's SMR Rating (94) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (99). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (56). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

MET's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AFL (91). This means that MET’s stock grew significantly faster than AFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AFL: $111.18 vs. MET: $94.35)
Brand notoriety: AFL: Not notable vs. MET: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 70% vs. MET: 85%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $56.93B vs. MET: $60.89B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $56.93B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $60.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $228.36K to $140.68B. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $18.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MET’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the long-term than AFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the short-term than MET.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -2.48% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -2.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

MET is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-2.32% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

View a ticker or compare two or three
AFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RHI37.791.04
+2.83%
Robert Half
BGL0.200.01
+2.71%
Blue Gold Limited
LYTS20.940.19
+0.92%
LSI Industries
PUK24.71-0.03
-0.12%
Prudential PLC
SRFM1.13-0.07
-5.83%
Surf Air Mobility

AFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFL
1D Price
Change %
AFL100%
-0.54%
CNO - AFL
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
PRI - AFL
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
GL - AFL
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
MET - AFL
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
UNM - AFL
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
More

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
+0.20%
PRU - MET
72%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
LNC - MET
70%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
CNO - MET
66%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
PRI - MET
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
JXN - MET
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
More