FG vs OEC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FG is a Hold and OEC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOEC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OEC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OEC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- OEC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FG (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while OEC (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -6.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.08%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
FG is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.
OEC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (+1.27% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.63% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| FG | OEC | FG / OEC | |
| Capitalization | 5.11B | 1.36B | 375% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 327M | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.648 | -27.244 | 50% |
| P/E Ratio | 72.99 | 13.52 | 540% |
| Revenue | 4.31B | 1.89B | 227% |
| Total Cash | 43.4B | 37.5M | 115,733% |
| Total Debt | 1.77B | 927M | 190% |
FG | OEC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FG's Valuation (37) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as OEC (57) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FG’s stock grew similarly to OEC’s over the last 12 months.
FG's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OEC (81) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FG’s stock grew somewhat faster than OEC’s over the last 12 months.
OEC's SMR Rating (70) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FG (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that OEC’s stock grew similarly to FG’s over the last 12 months.
FG's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as OEC (63) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FG’s stock grew similarly to OEC’s over the last 12 months.
OEC's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FG (98) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that OEC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FG’s over the last 12 months.
| FG | OEC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 9 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BITO | 20.05 | 0.16 | +0.80% |
| ProShares Bitcoin ETF | |||
| FKU | 43.28 | 0.08 | +0.19% |
| First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| JULD | 24.87 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| Innovator Premium Income 10 Bar ETF -Jul | |||
| QDEC | 26.62 | -0.24 | -0.89% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Dec | |||
| WTAI | 20.15 | -0.26 | -1.27% |
| WisdomTree Artfcl Intllgnc & Innvtn ETF | |||
FG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FG has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FG jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.
OEC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OEC has been closely correlated with CBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OEC jumps, then CBT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEC | 100% | -4.50% | ||
| CBT - OEC | 69% Closely correlated | -6.49% | ||
| ECVT - OEC | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| CC - OEC | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AVNT - OEC | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.32% | ||
| SCL - OEC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||