Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs RYMNX
FGADX vs RYMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs RYMNX
FGADX vs RYMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. RYMNX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Hold and RYMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 3.49B vs. RYMNX (135M). FGADX pays higher dividends than RYMNX: FGADX (8.48) vs RYMNX (2.77). FGADX was incepted earlier than RYMNX: FGADX (30 years) vs RYMNX (22 years). RYMNX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.62). RYMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 328.00 vs. FGADX (22.76). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYMNX: FGADX (0) vs RYMNX (2500). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.45 vs. RYMNX (42.97). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 240.03 vs. RYMNX (167.20).
| FGADX | RYMNX | FGADX / RYMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.53 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.58 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.342 | 14.643 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.49B | 135M | 2,587% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.48 | 2.77 | 306% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.45 | 42.97 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 334.88 | 231.66 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 240.03 | 167.20 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 327.06 | 213.28 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement