Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs RYMNX
FGADX vs RYMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs RYMNX
FGADX vs RYMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. RYMNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Buy and RYMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 3.13B vs. RYMNX (150M). FGADX pays higher dividends than RYMNX: FGADX (9.06) vs RYMNX (3.01). FGADX was incepted earlier than RYMNX: FGADX (29 years) vs RYMNX (22 years). RYMNX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.62). RYMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 452.00 vs. FGADX (22.76). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYMNX: FGADX (0) vs RYMNX (2500). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 79.15 vs. RYMNX (67.37). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 174.45 vs. RYMNX (108.02).
| FGADX | RYMNX | FGADX / RYMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.54 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.59 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.352 | 0.155 | -226% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 150M | 2,083% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.06 | 3.01 | 301% |
| Returns for 1 year | 79.15 | 67.37 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 261.53 | 180.49 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 174.45 | 108.02 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.80 | 171.92 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement