Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs RYMNX
FGADX vs RYMNX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs RYMNX
FGADX vs RYMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. RYMNX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Buy and RYMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 3.71B vs. RYMNX (145M). FGADX pays higher dividends than RYMNX: FGADX (11.18) vs RYMNX (3.70). FGADX was incepted earlier than RYMNX: FGADX (30 years) vs RYMNX (22 years). RYMNX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.62). RYMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 328.00 vs. FGADX (22.76). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYMNX: FGADX (0) vs RYMNX (2500). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 97.01 vs. RYMNX (77.90). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 273.12 vs. RYMNX (191.19).
| FGADX | RYMNX | FGADX / RYMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.54 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.59 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.242 | 22.212 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.71B | 145M | 2,559% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.18 | 3.70 | 302% |
| Returns for 1 year | 97.01 | 77.90 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 359.13 | 261.20 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 273.12 | 191.19 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 316.24 | 198.95 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement