Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs USERX
FGADX vs USERX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs USERX
FGADX vs USERX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. USERX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Buy and USERX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 3.06B vs. USERX (255M). FGADX pays higher dividends than USERX: FGADX (9.06) vs USERX (5.52). FGADX was incepted earlier than USERX: FGADX (29 years) vs USERX (52 years). USERX (1.63) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.62). USERX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FGADX (22.76). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than USERX: FGADX (0) vs USERX (5000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.74 vs. USERX (56.51). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 142.10 vs. USERX (106.19).
| FGADX | USERX | FGADX / USERX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.63 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.63 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 52 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.770 | -5.584 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.06B | 255M | 1,200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.06 | 5.52 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.74 | 56.51 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 237.33 | 198.73 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 142.10 | 106.19 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 291.42 | 262.23 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement