Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGAIX vs MSNCX
FGAIX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FGAIX vs MSNCX
FGAIX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGAIX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGAIX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 574M vs. FGAIX (264M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than FGAIX: MSNCX (3.29) vs FGAIX (2.52). FGAIX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FGAIX (31 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). FGAIX (1.29) is less costly to investors than MSNCX (0.86). FGAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.73 vs. MSNCX (6.00). FGAIX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.65 vs. FGAIX (6.82). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.24 vs. FGAIX (-2.96).
| FGAIX | MSNCX | FGAIX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.84 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.86 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.814 | 2.220 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264M | 574M | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.52 | 3.29 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | 7.65 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.48 | 3.98 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.96 | 3.24 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.42 | 15.29 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement