FGBI
Price
$9.04
Change
+$0.12 (+1.35%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
136.69M
40 days until earnings call
HIFS
Price
$294.19
Change
-$0.40 (-0.14%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
642.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGBI vs HIFS

Header iconFGBI vs HIFS Comparison
Open Charts FGBI vs HIFSBanner chart's image
First Guaranty Bancshares
Price$9.04
Change+$0.12 (+1.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization136.69M
Hingham Institution for Savings
Price$294.19
Change-$0.40 (-0.14%)
Volume$300
Capitalization642.81M
FGBI vs HIFS Comparison Chart in %
FGBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGBI vs. HIFS commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGBI is a Hold and HIFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FGBI: $9.04 vs. HIFS: $294.70)
Brand notoriety: FGBI and HIFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGBI: 234% vs. HIFS: 134%
Market capitalization -- FGBI: $136.69M vs. HIFS: $642.81M
FGBI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $136.69M. HIFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $642.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $169.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGBI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHIFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FGBI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HIFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FGBI and HIFS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGBI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGBI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HIFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIFS is a better buy in the short-term than FGBI.

Price Growth

FGBI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +12.93% price change this week, while HIFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +11.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

FGBI is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIFS($643M) has a higher market cap than FGBI($137M). FGBI has higher P/E ratio than HIFS: FGBI (61.92) vs HIFS (19.19). HIFS YTD gains are higher at: 16.841 vs. FGBI (-20.123). FGBI has more cash in the bank: 363M vs. HIFS (8.66M). FGBI has less debt than HIFS: FGBI (179M) vs HIFS (1.57B). FGBI has higher revenues than HIFS: FGBI (99.4M) vs HIFS (75.9M).
FGBIHIFSFGBI / HIFS
Capitalization137M643M21%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-20.12316.841-119%
P/E Ratio61.9219.19323%
Revenue99.4M75.9M131%
Total Cash363M8.66M4,190%
Total Debt179M1.57B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGBI vs HIFS: Fundamental Ratings
FGBI
HIFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1719
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
8655
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
378
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HIFS's Valuation (77) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FGBI (93) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HIFS’s stock grew similarly to FGBI’s over the last 12 months.

HIFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FGBI (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HIFS’s stock grew similarly to FGBI’s over the last 12 months.

HIFS's SMR Rating (55) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FGBI (86) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HIFS’s stock grew similarly to FGBI’s over the last 12 months.

HIFS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FGBI (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HIFS’s stock grew similarly to FGBI’s over the last 12 months.

FGBI's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HIFS (78) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FGBI’s stock grew significantly faster than HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGBIHIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYAN0.34N/A
N/A
Cyanotech Corp.
FRTAY16.68N/A
N/A
Freenet AG
IRRX8.10N/A
N/A
Integrated Rail and Resources Acquisition Corp.
DQJCY12.46-0.01
-0.08%
Pan Pac Intl Hldgs Corp.
FNBT40.18-0.22
-0.54%
FineMark Holdings, Inc.

HIFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIFS has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIFS jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIFS
1D Price
Change %
HIFS100%
+0.04%
BY - HIFS
78%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
MBWM - HIFS
78%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
TRMK - HIFS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
MCBS - HIFS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
FMBH - HIFS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
More