It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FGBI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePGC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FGBI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FGBI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.30% price change this week, while PGC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.80%.
FGBI is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.
PGC is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
FGBI | PGC | FGBI / PGC | |
Capitalization | 127M | 429M | 30% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -9.155 | -1.778 | 515% |
P/E Ratio | 16.52 | 8.96 | 184% |
Revenue | 93.5M | 226M | 41% |
Total Cash | 59.6M | 7.4M | 805% |
Total Debt | 269M | 553M | 49% |
FGBI | PGC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FGBI's Valuation (9) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGC (42). This means that FGBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGC’s over the last 12 months.
FGBI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (100). This means that FGBI’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.
PGC's SMR Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FGBI (42). This means that PGC’s stock grew similarly to FGBI’s over the last 12 months.
PGC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FGBI (59). This means that PGC’s stock grew similarly to FGBI’s over the last 12 months.
PGC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGBI (88). This means that PGC’s stock grew significantly faster than FGBI’s over the last 12 months.
FGBI | PGC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago76% | 7 days ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago68% | 7 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago67% | 7 days ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago76% | 26 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago69% | 7 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago64% | 7 days ago75% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TPVIX | 19.55 | 0.51 | +2.68% |
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value I | |||
TCVIX | 22.99 | 0.23 | +1.01% |
Touchstone Mid Cap Value Inst | |||
FEBCX | 13.14 | 0.05 | +0.38% |
First Eagle Global Income Builder C | |||
FCASX | 27.08 | 0.09 | +0.33% |
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C | |||
GEBRX | 9.48 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs ESG Em Mkts Eq R |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FGBI and CBFV have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGBI and CBFV's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGBI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FGBI | 100% | -1.43% | ||
CBFV - FGBI | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
GABC - FGBI | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.11% | ||
TBNK - FGBI | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
SBNY - FGBI | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
COLB - FGBI | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
More |