FGBIP
Price
$19.29
Change
-$0.13 (-0.67%)
Updated
May 2, 12:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
WAL
Price
$72.80
Change
+$1.82 (+2.56%)
Updated
May 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.88B
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FGBIP vs WAL

Header iconFGBIP vs WAL Comparison
Open Charts FGBIP vs WALBanner chart's image
First Guaranty Bancshares
Price$19.29
Change-$0.13 (-0.67%)
Volume$345
CapitalizationN/A
Western Alliance Ban
Price$72.80
Change+$1.82 (+2.56%)
Volume$17.09K
Capitalization6.88B
FGBIP vs WAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGBIP vs. WAL commentary
May 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGBIP is a StrongBuy and WAL is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 02, 2025
Stock price -- (FGBIP: $19.42 vs. WAL: $70.98)
Brand notoriety: FGBIP and WAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGBIP: 36% vs. WAL: 40%
Market capitalization -- FGBIP: $0 vs. WAL: $6.88B
FGBIP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. WAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGBIP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FGBIP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WAL is a better buy in the long-term than FGBIP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FGBIP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.75% price change this week, while WAL (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

WAL is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.84% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGBIP YTD gains are higher at: -1.023 vs. WAL (-14.664). WAL has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. FGBIP (59.6M). FGBIP has less debt than WAL: FGBIP (269M) vs WAL (8.12B). WAL has higher revenues than FGBIP: WAL (2.13B) vs FGBIP (93.5M).
FGBIPWALFGBIP / WAL
CapitalizationN/A6.88B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.023-14.6647%
P/E RatioN/A9.55-
Revenue93.5M2.13B4%
Total Cash59.6M289M21%
Total Debt269M8.12B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WAL: Fundamental Ratings
WAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
7
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSMR27.090.13
+0.47%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF
IDV32.26-0.03
-0.08%
iShares International Select Div ETF
DFSI36.58-0.12
-0.33%
Dimensional International Sstby Cr 1 ETF
VSDA49.28-0.32
-0.65%
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
PEX26.64-0.31
-1.15%
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity

FGBIP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGBIP has been loosely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGBIP jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGBIP
1D Price
Change %
FGBIP100%
+0.62%
WAL - FGBIP
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
UMBF - FGBIP
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.39%
CMA - FGBIP
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
KEY - FGBIP
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
BKU - FGBIP
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
More