FGBIP
Price
$19.90
Change
-$0.10 (-0.50%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UMBF
Price
$144.29
Change
-$0.30 (-0.21%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
10.96B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGBIP vs UMBF

FGBIP vs UMBF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGBIP vs. UMBF commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGBIP is a Buy and UMBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FGBIP: $19.90 vs. UMBF: $144.29)
Brand notoriety: FGBIP and UMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGBIP: 7% vs. UMBF: 49%
Market capitalization -- FGBIP: $0 vs. UMBF: $10.96B
FGBIP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. UMBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGBIP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FGBIP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMBF is a better buy in the long-term than FGBIP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGBIP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGBIP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UMBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGBIP is a better buy in the short-term than UMBF.

Price Growth

FGBIP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.20% price change this week, while UMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

UMBF is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGBIP YTD gains are higher at: 34.754 vs. UMBF (26.313). FGBIP has more cash in the bank: 845M vs. UMBF (736M). FGBIP has less debt than UMBF: FGBIP (179M) vs UMBF (256M). UMBF has higher revenues than FGBIP: UMBF (2.61B) vs FGBIP (92.1M).
FGBIPUMBFFGBIP / UMBF
CapitalizationN/A11B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.75426.313132%
P/E RatioN/A12.62-
Revenue92.1M2.61B4%
Total Cash845M736M115%
Total Debt179M256M70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UMBF: Fundamental Ratings
UMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGBIPUMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
48%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGBIP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QXL5.210.12
+2.36%
Quantum X Labs Inc.
DIN35.990.28
+0.78%
Dine Brands Global
CDZIP22.350.17
+0.77%
Cadiz
AGI28.86-0.60
-2.04%
Alamos Gold
NKTR68.32-2.04
-2.90%
Nektar Therapeutics

FGBIP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGBIP has been loosely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGBIP jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGBIP
1D Price
Change %
FGBIP100%
-0.50%
WAL - FGBIP
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
UMBF - FGBIP
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
KEY - FGBIP
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
BKU - FGBIP
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
BOH - FGBIP
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More