FGBIP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 23 of 38 cases where FGBIP's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FGBIP's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 14 of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 28 of 52 cases where FGBIP's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FGBIP just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where FGBIP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 16 of 37 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 43%.
Following a +0.59% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FGBIP advanced for three days, in 86 of 160 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FGBIP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 50%.
The Aroon Indicator for FGBIP entered a downward trend on October 14, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 1 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: FGBIP's P/B Ratio (0.000) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (1.323). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (23.509). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). FGBIP's Dividend Yield (0.097) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.030). FGBIP's P/S Ratio (0.000) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (3.738).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. FGBIP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FGBIP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.
The Aroon Indicator for UMBF entered a downward trend on October 15, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 159 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 122 of the 159 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 77%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where UMBF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where UMBF's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 16 of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 40 of 55 cases where UMBF's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on UMBF as a result. In 60 of 87 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for UMBF just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where UMBF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
Following a +1.47% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where UMBF advanced for three days, in 185 of 299 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
UMBF may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 10 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. UMBF’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 66 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.310) is normal, around the industry mean (1.323). P/E Ratio (11.095) is within average values for comparable stocks, (23.509). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.090) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.013) settles around the average of (0.030) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.807) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
UMBF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FGBIP | UMBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 54% | 22 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 77% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FGBIP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while UMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FGBIP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMBF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
FGBIP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.47% price change this week, while UMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.
UMBF is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGBIP has been loosely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGBIP jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGBIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGBIP | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| WAL - FGBIP | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| UMBF - FGBIP | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| KEY - FGBIP | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| BKU - FGBIP | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| BOH - FGBIP | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMBF has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMBF jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMBF | 100% | +2.24% | ||
| UBSI - UMBF | 88% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| UCB - UMBF | 88% Closely correlated | +2.68% | ||
| ONB - UMBF | 87% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| ASB - UMBF | 84% Closely correlated | +1.80% | ||
| CATY - UMBF | 83% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
More | ||||