Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGCKX vs GFAFX
FGCKX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FGCKX vs GFAFX
FGCKX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGCKX vs. GFAFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGCKX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FGCKX (97.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FGCKX: GFAFX (0.20) vs FGCKX (0.00). FGCKX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FGCKX (18 years) vs GFAFX (26 years). GFAFX (0.65) and FGCKX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGCKX (16.00). FGCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FGCKX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.97 vs. GFAFX (0.02). FGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 47.45 vs. GFAFX (13.04).
| FGCKX | GFAFX | FGCKX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.65 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.65 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.934 | 9.043 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.8B | 353B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.97 | 0.02 | 102,216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.90 | 42.74 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.45 | 13.04 | 364% |
| Returns for 10 years | 326.94 | 106.25 | 308% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers