Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGCKX vs GFAFX
FGCKX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FGCKX vs GFAFX
FGCKX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGCKX vs. GFAFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGCKX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FGCKX (92.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FGCKX: GFAFX (0.21) vs FGCKX (0.00). FGCKX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FGCKX (18 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.65) and FGCKX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGCKX (16.00). FGCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FGCKX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.67 vs. GFAFX (5.50). FGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 53.30 vs. GFAFX (17.03).
| FGCKX | GFAFX | FGCKX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.65 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.65 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.349 | 9.407 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.5B | 342B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.67 | 5.50 | 612% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.88 | 47.06 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.30 | 17.03 | 313% |
| Returns for 10 years | 315.45 | 101.31 | 311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers