Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGCKX vs RGAEX
FGCKX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts FGCKX vs RGAEX
FGCKX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGCKX vs. RGAEX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGCKX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FGCKX (97.8B). RGAEX pays higher dividends than FGCKX: RGAEX (0.21) vs FGCKX (0.00). FGCKX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: FGCKX (18 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). RGAEX (0.63) and FGCKX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGCKX (16.00). FGCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAEX: FGCKX (0) vs RGAEX (250). FGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.97 vs. RGAEX (-0.00). FGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 47.45 vs. RGAEX (12.98).
| FGCKX | RGAEX | FGCKX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.63 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.63 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.934 | 9.051 | 242% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.8B | 353B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.97 | -0.00 | -5,551,283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.90 | 42.68 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.45 | 12.98 | 366% |
| Returns for 10 years | 326.94 | 105.92 | 309% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers