Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGCKX vs RGEBX
FGCKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGCKX vs RGEBX
FGCKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGCKX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGCKX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FGCKX (97.8B). FGCKX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGCKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FGCKX (18 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FGCKX (0.62). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGCKX (16.00). FGCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FGCKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.97 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). FGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 47.45 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| FGCKX | RGEBX | FGCKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.934 | 8.727 | 251% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.8B | 353B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.97 | -0.77 | -3,227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.90 | 39.77 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.45 | 9.71 | 489% |
| Returns for 10 years | 326.94 | 97.58 | 335% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement