Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGCKX vs RGEBX
FGCKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGCKX vs RGEBX
FGCKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGCKX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGCKX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FGCKX (98.8B). FGCKX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGCKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FGCKX (18 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FGCKX (0.62). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGCKX (16.00). FGCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FGCKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.86 vs. RGEBX (5.18). FGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 51.31 vs. RGEBX (12.32).
| FGCKX | RGEBX | FGCKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.655 | 6.522 | 286% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 98.8B | 361B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.86 | 5.18 | 712% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.17 | 41.43 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.31 | 12.32 | 416% |
| Returns for 10 years | 352.84 | 105.28 | 335% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers