Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGCKX vs RGEBX
FGCKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGCKX vs RGEBX
FGCKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGCKX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGCKX is a Buy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FGCKX (92.5B). FGCKX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGCKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FGCKX (18 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FGCKX (0.62). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FGCKX (16.00). FGCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FGCKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FGCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.67 vs. RGEBX (4.65). FGCKX return over 5 years is better than : 53.30 vs. RGEBX (13.60).
| FGCKX | RGEBX | FGCKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.349 | 9.105 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.5B | 342B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.67 | 4.65 | 723% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.88 | 43.99 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.30 | 13.60 | 392% |
| Returns for 10 years | 315.45 | 92.84 | 340% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers