Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs FSAGX
FGDCX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs FSAGX
FGDCX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. FSAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a Hold and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX (4.44B) and FSAGX (4.44B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSAGX (4.29) and FGDCX (4.21) have matching dividends . FGDCX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: FGDCX (20 years) vs FSAGX (41 years). FGDCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.64). FGDCX (60.00) and FSAGX (60.00) have comparable annual turnover. FGDCX (0) and FSAGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSAGX (42.00) and FGDCX (40.53) have marching annual gain over last year. FSAGX return over 5 years is better than : 181.93 vs. FGDCX (167.90).
| FGDCX | FSAGX | FGDCX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.64 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.64 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.308 | 17.159 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 4.44B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.21 | 4.29 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.53 | 42.00 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 232.09 | 242.58 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 167.90 | 181.93 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 191.83 | 219.05 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement