Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs IIGCX
FGDCX vs IIGCX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs IIGCX
FGDCX vs IIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. IIGCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a Buy and IIGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. IIGCX (1.48B). IIGCX pays higher dividends than FGDCX: IIGCX (6.52) vs FGDCX (4.68). FGDCX was incepted earlier than IIGCX: FGDCX (20 years) vs IIGCX (23 years). IIGCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FGDCX (1.69). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. IIGCX (30.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than IIGCX: FGDCX (0) vs IIGCX (1000). IIGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 69.10 vs. FGDCX (51.24). IIGCX return over 5 years is better than : 166.02 vs. FGDCX (109.77).
| FGDCX | IIGCX | FGDCX / IIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.12 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.12 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.733 | 1.072 | -162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 1.48B | 286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.68 | 6.52 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.24 | 69.10 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 171.76 | 220.01 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.77 | 166.02 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.15 | 239.47 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers