Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs IIGCX
FGDCX vs IIGCX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs IIGCX
FGDCX vs IIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. IIGCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a Hold and IIGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 4.44B vs. IIGCX (1.72B). IIGCX pays higher dividends than FGDCX: IIGCX (5.96) vs FGDCX (4.21). FGDCX was incepted earlier than IIGCX: FGDCX (20 years) vs IIGCX (23 years). IIGCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FGDCX (1.69). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. IIGCX (30.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than IIGCX: FGDCX (0) vs IIGCX (1000). IIGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.83 vs. FGDCX (40.53). IIGCX return over 5 years is better than : 241.58 vs. FGDCX (167.90).
| FGDCX | IIGCX | FGDCX / IIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.12 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.12 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.308 | 18.080 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 1.72B | 259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.21 | 5.96 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.53 | 51.83 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 232.09 | 289.42 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 167.90 | 241.58 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 191.83 | 289.85 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement