Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs IIGCX
FGDCX vs IIGCX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs IIGCX
FGDCX vs IIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. IIGCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a Buy and IIGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 3.32B vs. IIGCX (1.35B). IIGCX pays higher dividends than FGDCX: IIGCX (7.71) vs FGDCX (5.60). FGDCX was incepted earlier than IIGCX: FGDCX (20 years) vs IIGCX (23 years). IIGCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FGDCX (1.69). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. IIGCX (30.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than IIGCX: FGDCX (0) vs IIGCX (1000). IIGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.97 vs. FGDCX (40.84). IIGCX return over 5 years is better than : 142.67 vs. FGDCX (87.85).
| FGDCX | IIGCX | FGDCX / IIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.12 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.12 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.754 | -7.797 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 1.35B | 245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.60 | 7.71 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.84 | 58.97 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 138.93 | 187.71 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.85 | 142.67 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.51 | 165.55 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement