Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs UIPMX
FGDCX vs UIPMX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs UIPMX
FGDCX vs UIPMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. UIPMX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a Hold and UIPMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 4.44B vs. UIPMX (1.24B). FGDCX pays higher dividends than UIPMX: FGDCX (4.21) vs UIPMX (0.22). FGDCX was incepted earlier than UIPMX: FGDCX (20 years) vs UIPMX (18 years). FGDCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than UIPMX (1.04). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. UIPMX (15.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UIPMX: FGDCX (0) vs UIPMX (1000000). FGDCX (41.84) and UIPMX (40.92) have marching annual gain over last year. UIPMX return over 5 years is better than : 216.83 vs. FGDCX (170.38).
| FGDCX | UIPMX | FGDCX / UIPMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.01 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.04 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.388 | 13.630 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 1.24B | 358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.21 | 0.22 | 1,900% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.84 | 40.92 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 235.17 | 248.90 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 170.38 | 216.83 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 194.54 | 273.46 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement