Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs UIPMX
FGDCX vs UIPMX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs UIPMX
FGDCX vs UIPMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. UIPMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a Hold and UIPMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 3.46B vs. UIPMX (971M). FGDCX pays higher dividends than UIPMX: FGDCX (5.51) vs UIPMX (0.29). FGDCX was incepted earlier than UIPMX: FGDCX (20 years) vs UIPMX (18 years). FGDCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than UIPMX (1.04). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. UIPMX (15.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UIPMX: FGDCX (0) vs UIPMX (1000000). UIPMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.94 vs. FGDCX (39.12). UIPMX return over 5 years is better than : 123.10 vs. FGDCX (93.09).
| FGDCX | UIPMX | FGDCX / UIPMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.01 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.04 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.474 | -11.964 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.46B | 971M | 357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.51 | 0.29 | 1,885% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.12 | 44.94 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 131.84 | 142.65 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.09 | 123.10 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.18 | 157.92 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement