Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs UIPMX
FGDCX vs UIPMX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs UIPMX
FGDCX vs UIPMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. UIPMX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a Hold and UIPMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. UIPMX (1.11B). FGDCX pays higher dividends than UIPMX: FGDCX (4.68) vs UIPMX (0.25). FGDCX was incepted earlier than UIPMX: FGDCX (19 years) vs UIPMX (18 years). FGDCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than UIPMX (1.10). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. UIPMX (1.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UIPMX: FGDCX (0) vs UIPMX (1000000). FGDCX (57.95) and UIPMX (57.87) have marching annual gain over last year. UIPMX return over 5 years is better than : 128.42 vs. FGDCX (101.94).
| FGDCX | UIPMX | FGDCX / UIPMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.01 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.10 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.687 | -0.589 | -626% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 1.11B | 380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.68 | 0.25 | 1,878% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.95 | 57.87 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 166.43 | 175.65 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.94 | 128.42 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.26 | 245.21 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers