Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs UIPMX
FGDCX vs UIPMX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs UIPMX
FGDCX vs UIPMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. UIPMX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a Hold and UIPMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 3.32B vs. UIPMX (1.34B). FGDCX pays higher dividends than UIPMX: FGDCX (5.60) vs UIPMX (0.30). FGDCX was incepted earlier than UIPMX: FGDCX (20 years) vs UIPMX (18 years). FGDCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than UIPMX (1.04). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. UIPMX (15.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UIPMX: FGDCX (0) vs UIPMX (1000000). UIPMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 77.76 vs. FGDCX (68.23). UIPMX return over 5 years is better than : 245.11 vs. FGDCX (185.95).
| FGDCX | UIPMX | FGDCX / UIPMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.01 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.04 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.928 | 21.836 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 1.34B | 249% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.60 | 0.30 | 1,893% |
| Returns for 1 year | 68.23 | 77.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 247.60 | 287.25 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 185.95 | 245.11 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.71 | 268.67 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement