Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDCX vs UIPMX
FGDCX vs UIPMX Comparison
Open Charts FGDCX vs UIPMX
FGDCX vs UIPMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDCX vs. UIPMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDCX is a Hold and UIPMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. UIPMX (1.05B). FGDCX pays higher dividends than UIPMX: FGDCX (4.68) vs UIPMX (0.25). FGDCX was incepted earlier than UIPMX: FGDCX (20 years) vs UIPMX (18 years). FGDCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than UIPMX (1.10). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. UIPMX (1.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UIPMX: FGDCX (0) vs UIPMX (1000000). UIPMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.94 vs. FGDCX (48.81). UIPMX return over 5 years is better than : 141.50 vs. FGDCX (108.71).
| FGDCX | UIPMX | FGDCX / UIPMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.01 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.10 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.573 | -5.403 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 1.05B | 402% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.68 | 0.25 | 1,878% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.81 | 51.94 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 169.44 | 178.96 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.71 | 141.50 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.05 | 209.00 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement