Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGDIX vs IIGCX
FGDIX vs IIGCX Comparison
Open Charts FGDIX vs IIGCX
FGDIX vs IIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDIX vs. IIGCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDIX is a Hold and IIGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDIX has more cash in the bank: 3.46B vs. IIGCX (1.38B). IIGCX pays higher dividends than FGDIX: IIGCX (7.62) vs FGDIX (5.53). FGDIX was incepted earlier than IIGCX: FGDIX (20 years) vs IIGCX (23 years). IIGCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FGDIX (0.69). FGDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. IIGCX (30.00). FGDIX has a lower initial minimum investment than IIGCX: FGDIX (0) vs IIGCX (1000). IIGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.16 vs. FGDIX (40.53). IIGCX return over 5 years is better than : 148.18 vs. FGDIX (103.04).
| FGDIX | IIGCX | FGDIX / IIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.12 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.12 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.997 | -5.994 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.46B | 1.38B | 251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.53 | 7.62 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.53 | 57.16 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 138.90 | 176.64 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.04 | 148.18 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.16 | 183.59 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers